[SC2 Forum] Q:Does the Zergling vs. Zealot ratio remain at 4:1 or has it changed in the latest builds? A:One zealot can usually take out two, and sometimes three zerglings. However, the ratio is mainly based on positioning and micro-controlling. As the number of zealots grows, it will take more zerglings to win the fight since the zealots can clump up and reduce the attacking surface area. Smart use of terrain, such as a choke or backing up against a wall, will also help a protoss player reduce this attack area. Zerglings have to secure a good surround around the zealots to keep the ratio close. Q:一个狂热者当前照旧不是能周旋四个小狗？最新版本中有什么改变么？ A:时常情况下，一名狂热者也许砍杀2只小狗，有时也也许周旋3只，只是这个比率首要看兵种站位和玩家操作来决计。随着亢奋者数目的增加，由于他们也许集合在一同减少攻击面的大小，是以他们也许应对更多的小狗。精巧的利用黑烟、高墙等地形也也许协助神族玩家减少攻击面的大小。而虫族玩家必须确保小狗对于亢奋者有着很好的围困上风，只有如此本领让虫族愈加有利。 [SC Legacy] Q:In World of Warcraft pvp they found an issue over time that it was "very unsatisfying" to the player when they lost control of their character as it limited their ability to do their job or role. There is a noticeable increase in stuns and immobilization in Starcraft 2, which was barely present in Starcraft 1. From your experience in testing, do you feel abilities, which limit unit control, provide more dynamic game play so far or are you noticing more concern? A:First of all, there were actually some abilities in the original StarCraft that could cause players to lose control of units. These abilities include the ghost’s lockdown, the corsair’s disruption web, and the dark archon’s mind control. It may be premature to suggest at this point that there’s a “noticeable increase” in stuns and immobilization in StarCraft II. To address the comparison anyway, in World of Warcraft, you control a single character, unlike RTS games where you manage multiple units and bases. The difference in the World of Warcraft is when you lose control of your character you simply have to wait it out, assuming you don’t have any control breaks. However in StarCraft, when units in your army are being controlled, you can still issue orders to the rest of your army, manage your base, build new units, etc. There are a lot of options and we happy with the diversity it brings to gameplay at this point. Q:在[魔兽天下]的PvP中，跟着时间的推移，玩家发明了一个沉重的题目：当角色受到才智节制成效而无法顺遂告竣任务的时刻，玩家会出格不爽。在[星际争霸2]中，昏迷和定身等成效的呈现的几率大大增补，而这些在[星际1]中实在是不生计的。从你的经验上看，你是否感到这些抑制技术给比赛带来了更多的随机性？也许你料到了更多劝化？ A:首先，在[星际争霸1]中就生计着许多抑制技术，像鬼魂的锁定，海盗船的干扰网，阴暗执政官的心灵抑制等。现在就说[星际争霸2]的昏迷和定身成效的呈现率“大大增补”依旧早了点. 不管何如，议决对比来看，在[魔兽天下]中玩家抑制的是零丁的角色，而不像RTS游戏中须要管制多个单元和基地。这带来的分辨差别即是，在[魔兽天下]中玩家落空了对角色的抑制时——假定当时你没有破除抑制的才智——你必需守候直到成效完结；而在[星际争霸]中，当你的军队被抑制时，你还不妨对残存的军队莆田游戏发号施令，举行基地管制、临蓐新的单元等操作。你的拣选有许多，并且我们对这些抑制技术带来的各类性很舒适。 Q:What is the current status of the Mothership? What niche does it fill at this time, and if the unit were removed, would there be a reason to fill that niche with a different unit or would protoss still be fine? A:Currently the mothership has a passive cloaking field for nearby units and buildings, wormhole transit, temporal rift, and vortex as its abilities. We are happy with the state of the mothership at this time, and would like to hear feedback from the players once beta starts. Q:神族母舰目前的状况若何了？ A:目前母舰有着一个被动的疆场掩蔽才智，可能使邻近的单元和建设隐形，此外还有虫洞传送、时间裂隙以及大漩涡才智。我们对目前母舰的状况很惬意，在Beta最先后我们也很情愿倾听玩家们的反馈意见。 (本文地址：http://pt.gvodfans.net/putianyouxizhongxin/201009/76.html) |